Wearing Earplugs in Wisconsin
"Dear James,
There is a woman who walks by my house every morning with her dog. This woman feels the need to yell obscenities at her dog non-stop as she walks very slowly through our neighborhood! This is upsetting for two reasons: 1. She should not be allowed to verbally abuse her dog like that (isn't there some kind of pet abuse law?), and 2. it makes for an unpleasant breakfast on an otherwise nice day. It is driving me crazy, and I have even considered moving out of the neighborhood rather than listen to that angry woman ranting. But I love my home and my neighborhood otherwise! What should I do?
Wearing Earplugs in Wisconsin"
Dear Ear,
What your neighbor is doing is taking advantage of a sometimes overlooked phenomena within our culture whereby senior citizens can commit limited breaches of social etiquette, the severity of such being directly correlated to their age. With this in mind your first course of action should be to determine whether her offensive activities fall within those permitted by her age. Please refer to the chart below:
50-59: This is around when menopause occurs in most women, and as such it has become polite to assume that rude or excessively bellicose behavior is a direct result of it. Nonetheless a female of this age is still a ways off from the adorable/pitiable old lady stereotypes permeating our culture. As such, misbehavior should be limited to the occasional snide remark and rare tantrum. If you're dealing with more than a daily insult or bi-monthly tantrum then you are allowed to dislike and confront them. Note that none of the protections granted by this age category apply to men.
60-69: At this age the government gets involved, officially declaring the person old. They are often no longer required to work and frequently eat more cheaply at restaraunts. Both of these factors lend an official air to the respect and tolerance the elderly may commandeer from society. Additionally, because they leave the workforce at this age the common man's interaction with them decreases. We know less about what they do from day to day, what they think about and so on. This creates an air of mystery, an unknown element in their behavior that gives pause to those who would try to hold them accountable by standard rules of behavior. Here old people gain significantly more leeway in their insult and tantrum allotments, as well as some access to offensively weird behavior such as wearing one's underpants on the outside of one's clothing (around the house at least).
70-79: At this age a person is nearing what is, on average, the end of their life. The average American will live until right around the age of 78. This has created an acceptance by society of socially required compassion towards such individuals. If you encounter somone of this age you are obligated to tolerate outright insane behavior, even if the old person is in public. In addition they have the right to make demands of anyone that makes eye contact with them, so be wary of such. Note that at this age it is also considered rude for reporting them to the authorities for any crime less than a felony.
80-89: These people have cheated death, advancing to a stage in their lives that most of us will never see. It is permissible for those of this age to rob liquor stores, excrete in public, go into your house and use your plasma screen TV... As an ironing board. Don't be too allarmed, as by this age most people have failed to keep track of their advancing social power and rarely excercise the rights granted by this category.
90 and up: There is no realistic boundaries on what is socially acceptable for someone of this age. Fortunately mass genocide is often unfeasible for people of this age due to advancing physical ailments.
With the above in mind you should aproximate the offending party's age and cross-reference it with her socially permissable behavior as indicated. You are probably looking in the 60+ range for what you described. Don't worry too much about ascertaining her precise age, appearances are the only thing that matters for purposes of etiquette.If the woman is not sufficiently senior-citizenish to be tolerated making a potentially offensive daily commotion in the morning hours then you have the right to confront her directly. Unfortunately, she breaches no laws in the verbal abuse of her dog as only physical abuse and neglect of animals are covered by Oregon Law (http://www.animal-law.org/statutes/oregon.htm), so you will likely have to talk to her in person rather than sick the police on her. This confrontation should be handled delicately. Afterall, if she has such little regard for her pet's wellbeing, odds are she couldn't care less about a person she's never met before. If you offend her it may illicit the petty spite of someone with nothing better to do than make your mornings miserable. Instead I suggest a polite exchange of bald-faced lies. Perhaps your father just moved in with you after your mother died. He might sleep in the morning, being easily disturbed and potentially ill if he can't remain in slumber. Just be careful about making up medical conditions while you lie. The elderly sometimes keep themselves very up to date on medical news, and she may see through a ruse involving a disease you know less than her about.
Even if she is sufficiently advanced in years to negate any stigma for ruckus-making, all is not lost. Passive aggression is a time honored technique developed to deal with troublesome, but socially invulnerable individuals. Try setting up a fake crime scene outside your apartment. Alternatively, arrange with your neighbors to "forget" to tie up their larger dog on mornings when she's likely to be by. Pretty much any idea may be attempted as long as it doesn't involve any public criticism of her behavior. If you feel outraged that you would have to go through such rigmarole, I'm afraid the only other solution is to commit a social faux pas, and even though this would be far easier, less time consuming, safer and all around superior I'm restricted from suggesting any course of action that is not "socially justifiable" by my status as an advice columnist. Just keep in mind that someday you too will be old.
Best of Luck,
James
There is a woman who walks by my house every morning with her dog. This woman feels the need to yell obscenities at her dog non-stop as she walks very slowly through our neighborhood! This is upsetting for two reasons: 1. She should not be allowed to verbally abuse her dog like that (isn't there some kind of pet abuse law?), and 2. it makes for an unpleasant breakfast on an otherwise nice day. It is driving me crazy, and I have even considered moving out of the neighborhood rather than listen to that angry woman ranting. But I love my home and my neighborhood otherwise! What should I do?
Wearing Earplugs in Wisconsin"
Dear Ear,
What your neighbor is doing is taking advantage of a sometimes overlooked phenomena within our culture whereby senior citizens can commit limited breaches of social etiquette, the severity of such being directly correlated to their age. With this in mind your first course of action should be to determine whether her offensive activities fall within those permitted by her age. Please refer to the chart below:
50-59: This is around when menopause occurs in most women, and as such it has become polite to assume that rude or excessively bellicose behavior is a direct result of it. Nonetheless a female of this age is still a ways off from the adorable/pitiable old lady stereotypes permeating our culture. As such, misbehavior should be limited to the occasional snide remark and rare tantrum. If you're dealing with more than a daily insult or bi-monthly tantrum then you are allowed to dislike and confront them. Note that none of the protections granted by this age category apply to men.
60-69: At this age the government gets involved, officially declaring the person old. They are often no longer required to work and frequently eat more cheaply at restaraunts. Both of these factors lend an official air to the respect and tolerance the elderly may commandeer from society. Additionally, because they leave the workforce at this age the common man's interaction with them decreases. We know less about what they do from day to day, what they think about and so on. This creates an air of mystery, an unknown element in their behavior that gives pause to those who would try to hold them accountable by standard rules of behavior. Here old people gain significantly more leeway in their insult and tantrum allotments, as well as some access to offensively weird behavior such as wearing one's underpants on the outside of one's clothing (around the house at least).
70-79: At this age a person is nearing what is, on average, the end of their life. The average American will live until right around the age of 78. This has created an acceptance by society of socially required compassion towards such individuals. If you encounter somone of this age you are obligated to tolerate outright insane behavior, even if the old person is in public. In addition they have the right to make demands of anyone that makes eye contact with them, so be wary of such. Note that at this age it is also considered rude for reporting them to the authorities for any crime less than a felony.
80-89: These people have cheated death, advancing to a stage in their lives that most of us will never see. It is permissible for those of this age to rob liquor stores, excrete in public, go into your house and use your plasma screen TV... As an ironing board. Don't be too allarmed, as by this age most people have failed to keep track of their advancing social power and rarely excercise the rights granted by this category.
90 and up: There is no realistic boundaries on what is socially acceptable for someone of this age. Fortunately mass genocide is often unfeasible for people of this age due to advancing physical ailments.
With the above in mind you should aproximate the offending party's age and cross-reference it with her socially permissable behavior as indicated. You are probably looking in the 60+ range for what you described. Don't worry too much about ascertaining her precise age, appearances are the only thing that matters for purposes of etiquette.If the woman is not sufficiently senior-citizenish to be tolerated making a potentially offensive daily commotion in the morning hours then you have the right to confront her directly. Unfortunately, she breaches no laws in the verbal abuse of her dog as only physical abuse and neglect of animals are covered by Oregon Law (http://www.animal-law.org/statutes/oregon.htm), so you will likely have to talk to her in person rather than sick the police on her. This confrontation should be handled delicately. Afterall, if she has such little regard for her pet's wellbeing, odds are she couldn't care less about a person she's never met before. If you offend her it may illicit the petty spite of someone with nothing better to do than make your mornings miserable. Instead I suggest a polite exchange of bald-faced lies. Perhaps your father just moved in with you after your mother died. He might sleep in the morning, being easily disturbed and potentially ill if he can't remain in slumber. Just be careful about making up medical conditions while you lie. The elderly sometimes keep themselves very up to date on medical news, and she may see through a ruse involving a disease you know less than her about.
Even if she is sufficiently advanced in years to negate any stigma for ruckus-making, all is not lost. Passive aggression is a time honored technique developed to deal with troublesome, but socially invulnerable individuals. Try setting up a fake crime scene outside your apartment. Alternatively, arrange with your neighbors to "forget" to tie up their larger dog on mornings when she's likely to be by. Pretty much any idea may be attempted as long as it doesn't involve any public criticism of her behavior. If you feel outraged that you would have to go through such rigmarole, I'm afraid the only other solution is to commit a social faux pas, and even though this would be far easier, less time consuming, safer and all around superior I'm restricted from suggesting any course of action that is not "socially justifiable" by my status as an advice columnist. Just keep in mind that someday you too will be old.
Best of Luck,
James

